|
Asian Productivity Organization (APO)
Project Reports: Industry and Services
STUDY MEETING ON CREATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP
18–21 May 2004, Taipei, Republic of China
|
BACKGROUND |
Entrepreneurship is the driving force bringing
innovations to the marketplace and establishing
a community of high-growth firms. A creative entrepreneurial
sector or community within an economy can contribute
significantly to its prosperity. With change as
the constant in today's globalized world, entrepreneurs
constantly seize any arising opportunities to
create new wealth. Peter Drucker in his book Innovation
and Entrepreneurship noted that: "Entrepreneurs
see change as the norm and as healthy. He or she
always searches for change, responds to it, and
exploits it as an opportunity."
Embracing creativity and innovation, an entrepreneurs
products or services can bring about business
growth, productivity improvement, job and wealth
creation, an enhanced image for the economy, and
ultimately a better quality of life for all. Policy
makers have recognized that creative entrepreneurship
needs to be encouraged through appropriate policies
that foster entrepreneurship, innovation, and
technological development. Some countries have
introduced science parks in the hope that the
provision of infrastructure will spark the development
of high-tech ventures with new innovations and
inventions that can become global products and
services.
Within enterprises, there is a need for creative
entrepreneurship. Some enlightened corporations
have fostered creative entrepreneurship within
their organizations by providing opportunities
for innovation, intraorganization venture financing,
and ownership of employee-initiated projects.
More needs to be done in this area to motivate
the involvement of incumbents in a corporation
through tangible and intangible means.
This study meeting sought to promote the exchange
of knowledge of, experience in, and approaches
to creative entrepreneurship and creativity and
innovation as a strategy for business excellence
and growth in APO member countries. It investigated
the following subtopics:
-
Relevance of creative entrepreneurship for
business growth and economic prosperity
-
Critical examination of success factors for
entrepreneurs
-
Role of stakeholders, especially the government
or NPOs, in promoting entrepreneurship
-
Measures available to access entrepreneurial
activities in an economy and their economic
impact
-
Development of enterprise "ecosystems"
The study meeting was jointly organized by the
APO and the host country, the ROC, through the
China Productivity Centre (CPC) from 1821
May 2004 in Taipei. Sixteen participants from
the 12 member countries India, Indonesia, Islamic
Republic of Iran, the ROK, Malaysia, Mongolia,
Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand,
and Vietnam contributed to the deliberations of
the meeting. Three APO resource persons from Malaysia,
the ROK, and Singapore provided resource inputs
in addition to two local resource persons. To
supplement the learning with practical examples,
a field visit was organized to the National Taiwan
University Innovation Incubation Centre (NTUIIC),
where two of its successful tenants, Universal
Vision Biotechnology and Genozyme Biotech, were
introduced to the participants.
The list of participants and resource persons,
and program schedule are attached as Annexes 1
and 2, respectively.
|
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SYMPOSIUM |
1. Presentations by Resource Persons |
1.1 What Is Creative Entrepreneurship? |
|
In the overview of the study meeting, Professor
W.L. Tan of Singapore Management Unviersity pointed
out that the meeting would consider:
a. Spheres of creative entrepreneurship:
-
Whonew ventures, serial entrepreneurs,
existing ventures (by themselves), existing
ventures (together with others), regions, and
networks.
-
Whatnew products/services based on innovations
or technology, new markets, new processes, or
new business models.
b. Challenges hindering the growth of creative
entrepreneurship and how enterprises overcame
them on their own or with assistance from the
private sector and/or government.
The main themes to be covered were:
-
Creative entrepreneurs
-
Public policies driving creative entrepreneurship
-
International creative entrepreneurs
-
Technology and innovation
-
Corporate entrepreneurship
|
|
1.2 Corporate Entrepreneurship |
|
Professor Tan highlighted the potential that
most enterprises neglect when they consider ways
to be creative and entrepreneurial, that is, they
fail to engage the creativity of their workforce.
Corporate entrepreneurship spans a continuum of
possibilities, beginning with an R&D department,
to involving only middle managers, to permeating
the whole organization. Whatever the level or extent of the organization
one wishes to engage in corporate entrepreneurship,
there is a need to change organizational factors.
Certain factors have been identified by researchers
as important for fostering corporate entrepreneurship.
The most important are the attitudes of the intended
employees. The proper attitudes toward corporate
entrepreneurship will lead to objectives and subsequent
actions. Other factors include organizational
culture, practices, flexibility, and sponsorship
of employee innovation projects. An organizational
culture that results in creative entrepreneurship
allows employees to remain with their projects
(continuity), encourages communication across
areas and levels of the firm, creates cross-functional
teams, encourages decision making by all even
at the lowest level of the organization, and permits
project teams multiple options so that they are
not confined to procurement from limited sources.
It does not encourage risk aversion or conformity.
Such organizations train and develop their workforces,
encourage creative decision making, do not frown
upon projects with small beginnings, and spread
any innovation throughout the whole organization.
There is flexibility in the operation of the teams
and the organization sponsors projects. In his
study of Singapore middle managers, Professor
Tan found that organizational culture, flexibility,
and sponsorship influenced middle managers to
become internal corporate entrepreneurs (intrapreneurs). |
|
|
1.3 Product Innovation and Business
Model (the Case of OKWAP Phone) |
|
Mr. Jackson Chang, Chairman of Inventec Appliances
Corporation, expanded on Professor Tans
presentation by showing how his company was able
to involve its project teams in developing the
ROCs most popular locally produced mobile
telephones, with the brandname of OKWAP. The phones
have the same features as the internationally
known brands Samsung, Nokia, and Sony Ericsson. He introduced the participants to the various
considerations of an effective product innovation
process and business model: strategy (positioning,
entry segment, competing edge), execution (resources,
process, and integration), and deployment (marketing
and promotion, community service, and sustaining
competitiveness). Taking these into consideration,
Inventec developed its unique mobile phones with
local content functions such as the Taiwan personal
digital assistant and dictionary; culture-related
content such as Web site support for free downloads;
and a local touch like tailormade capability,
promotion activities, and service and community
features. |
|
|
1.4 Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught?
The Experience of the ROC |
|
Professor C.T. Wen of the Graduate Institute
of Technology and Innovation Management, National
Cheng-chi University, explained how he developed
the entrepreneurship program at the university
to develop creative entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial
teams. He made a study of overseas programs including
the MIT e-Lab, University of Southern California
Student Incubator Hatchery, University of Washington
New Venture Creation Lab, Osaka Venture Factory,
and Innocamp of Norway. He concluded that to foster
creative entrepreneurship in the university environment,
there is a need to create activities and an environment
within which the students can develop ideas, work
through those ideas, and involve university programs
and resources to refine them, and interact with
the mentors provided by the university to result
in new ventures (Figure 1).
At the National Cheng-chi University, Professor
Wen has encouraged entrepreneurship through the
mentoring of business plan teams for the Taiwan
Innovation Competition that is based on the MIT
50k Business Plan competition. He shared his conviction
that for creative entrepreneurship to occur, a
suitable milieu must be created wherein individuals
can choose the combinations that work for them.
Business plan competitions by themselves do not
lead to entrepreneurship but often only create
gamesmanship. He noted that there has been a decline
in student interest in such competitions.
Figure 1. Facilitating creative
entrepreneurship at National Cheng-chi University

|
|
|
1.5 Strategy for Creating an Entrepreneurial
Incubator: the National Taiwan University Case |
|
Taiwan is a showcase for successful ecosystems
for creative entrepreneurship in its incubators.
There has been an increase in the number of incubators
established after the international success of
firms incubated at the Hsinchu Industrial Park,
in particular at the Industrial Technology Research
Institute (ITRI). ITRI is a primary R&D center
for industry in the ROC. In 1973, when ITRI was
founded, there was very little high-tech industry
in the country. Today, the ROC is a world-class
player in semiconductors, personal computers,
and many other high-tech sectors. ITRI has played
a significant role in this transformation. Professor K.C. Fan outlined the way in which
National Taiwan University (NTU) created its entrepreneurial
incubator center, one of many being developed
by universities and funded by the government.
The entrepreneurial incubator center enables professors
involvement in consultancy, students involvement
in internships, and the universitys involvement
in setting up laboratories, facility utilization,
and entrepreneurial programs. The additional expected
benefits include commercialization of technology
developed on campus, the formation of academic
team groups as new start-up teams, and linkages
between the university and industry. However,
the center will face challenges, as Professor
Fan noted that other university incubators have
not been financially self-sustaining if financial
support from the university or government is cut.
Further, their contributions to universities are
still not satisfactory in terms of equity returns.
Perhaps the way forward is to permit universities
to attract private investment in the incubators,
as is being tried in China and at Universiti Sains
in Malaysia. |
|
|
1.6 NTU Incubation Center Site
Visit |
|
The participants learned more about product innovation
through a site visit to the NTUs entrepreneurial
incubator center. Professors K.C. Fan and Chau-Chen
Yang introduced the NTUIIC to the participants.
As an incubator, the NTUIIC created an environment
for "start-ups" and "innovation"
with the objectives of lowering the risk of start-ups,
improving the R&D capability of enterprises,
assisting traditional enterprises to seek advances
in technology, and to extend R&D conducted
at the NTU until the final stage of commercialization.
The relationship of the incubator in relation
to the tenants is shown in Figure 2. The incubator
is structured as a company that is the interface
between the tenants and the other stakeholders
(internal and external). It has had modest success
and has been able to attract university alumni
and notable businesspeople to act as mentors.
Since its formation in 2002, it has "graduated"
28 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) representing
14 in information technology, 11 in engineering,
and three in the field of biotechnology. It is
presently incubating 19 firms.
Two of its tenants, Universal Vision Biotechnology
and Genozyme Biotech, were introduced to the participants.
Universal Vision Biotechnology is the first management
consultation company in the field of professional
ophthalmic treatment and the first to specialize
in ophthalmic biotechnology in the ROC. It is
in the incubator because one of its projects is
R&D involving the NTU faculty to improve vision
biotechnology techniques using excimer lasers,
the vision treatment commonly associated with
high myopia called LASIK. The other tenant, Genozyme
Biotech, focuses on biotechnology applications
for the livestock industry and produces enzymes
for feed improvement and tests for the detection
of toxins in feed which ranchers can use to improve
livestock yields.
Figure 2. Incubators, tenants,
and other stakeholders in the NTUIIC

|
|
|
1.7 The Interface between Entrepreneurship,
Creativity, and Innovation: The Malaysian Experience |
|
Dato Mustafa Mansur drew from the Malaysian
experience to demonstrate how Malaysian entrepreneurs
and enterprises have continued to find niches
and expand their markets. He presented two case
studies: Royal Selangor International and Air
Asia.
Royal Selangor International is a world-renowned
producer of pewterware and high-end gift items,
including jewellery. Although it has its share
of competitors who have tried to mimic its products,
Royal Selangor has employed an innovative marketing
strategy involving creatively displayed showrooms,
on-line shopping opportunities since 1996, and
new design collections. It has found innovations
to be critical because its products have short
life cycles, and its designs can be easily copied
by competitors and are nonessential luxury items. AirAsia is Asias first low-fare, no-frills
airline to introduce ticketless travel. It operates
frequent flights and plies routes not covered
by mainline operators, saving costs through the
use of modern technologies to manage its operations
like on-line booking and payment facilities, a
multilingual Web site offering real-time holiday
packages, mobile phone short message booking and
checking of flight schedules, and a direct "B2B
engine" with agents and virtual credit cards.
The interesting element is that the creative team
did not come from the airline industry but from
the music industry. They infused techniques used
in the promotion of services and advertisements
in the music industry in the new airline. |
|
|
1.8 Creativity and Entrepreneurship |
|
Dr. M.K. Kim of Soongsil University School of
Entrepreneurship and SME Management in his presentation
focused on the theory of creativity and how it interfaces
with entrepreneurship. In particular, he stressed
that creativity is a collective capability that
the whole organization can embrace. There are steps
that organizations need to take, however. They should
develop skills and capabilities that make it unique
both in the present and in the future. The uniqueness
is collective in nature, founded on the culture
of the organization, in particular the way it operates
and communicates as a team, rather than the creative
skills of a few elite employees. The creative capability
of the organization is shaped by the way the entire
staff works and feels about the organization. Therefore
creativity often involves organizational development
processes rather than recruitment and career management
tasks. |
|
|
PRESENTATIONS BY PARTICIPANTS |
|
In addition to the resource speakers, the participants
presented papers on the theme of the study meeting.
The topics of their papers are listed below. The
participants, to varying degrees, covered the
topics assigned to them. The presentation contents
served as the basis for the ensuing discussions.
Topics
of country papers |
| Participant |
Country |
Assigned topic(s) |
1. |
Mr. Kamal Dev |
India |
Creative entrepreneurship in international
enterprises from India:
-
The internationalization of Indian enterprises
-
What motivates these enterprise and
in what ways have they been creative?
-
How public policy has assisted efforts
to develop creative entrepreneurship
|
2. |
Mr. Susanto Joseph |
Indonesia |
Creative entrepreneurship in Indonesia:
Examples of innovative entrepreneurs and
serial entrepreneurs who followed initial
successes with new and different start-ups.
What characterizes their strategies and
success? |
3. |
Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadpour Daryani |
Iran |
Efforts in Iran to encourage creative entrepreneurship: |
4. |
Mr. Lee Yong Geun |
ROK |
Implementing creative entrepreneurship
in Korean enterprises:
-
How Korean companies encourage creativity
and entrepreneurialism
-
Examples from Join Electrical Construction
-
Obstacles to current efforts to develop
creative entrepreneurship
|
5. |
Mr. Myung Kwan Kim |
ROK |
How successful has Korea been in establishing
innovation networks and encouraging SMEs
to engage in innovation and R&D?
Measures to establish networks and examples
of how they work
|
6. |
Mr. Zainal Abidin bin Othaman |
Malaysia |
How entrepreneurs in Malaysia have infused
their corporations with entrepreneurship
and developed innovation teams |
7. |
Mr. Dashdorj Banzragch |
Mongolia |
Creative entrepreneurship in international
enterprises from Mongolia:
-
Internationalization of Mongolian enterprises
-
What motivates these enterprises and
in what ways have they been creative?
-
How public policy has assisted efforts
to develop creative entrepreneurship
|
8. |
Mr. Sukunta Lal Hirachan |
Nepal |
Efforts in Nepal to encourage creative
entrepreneurship: |
9. |
Dr. Justino Roces Arboleda |
Philippines |
The role of technological scanning and
adoption in creative entrepreneurship: |
10. |
Mr. Adrian Lim |
Singapore |
Creative entrepreneurship in international
enterprises from Singapore:
-
Internationalization of enterprises
in Singapore
-
What motivates these enterprises and
in what ways have they been creative?
-
How public policy has assisted efforts
to develop creative entrepreneurship
|
11. |
Dr. Aloysius Tay |
Singapore |
How corporations stay ahead of the competition
in the development or adoption of technology: |
12. |
Mr. Samantha Sathischandra Wanniarachchi
Kumarasinghe |
Sri Lanka |
Implementing creative entrepreneurship
in Sri Lankan enterprises:
-
How Sri Lankan companies encourage their
workforces to continue to be creative
and entrepreneurial
-
Examples from the Multichemical Group
of Companies
-
Obstacles to current efforts to develop
creative entrepreneurship
|
13. |
Mr. Wiwat Chutiwanichavakul |
Thailand |
How Thailand has or is attempting to establish
innovation networks, how these networks
function, and their success in creative
entrepreneurship |
14. |
Ms. Waleeporn Thanathikom |
Thailand |
Creative entrepreneurship in Thailand: |
15. |
Mr. Do Chi Thien |
Vietnam |
Creative entrepreneurship in international
enterprises from Vietnam:
-
The internationalization of Vietnamese
enterprises
-
What motivates these enterprises and
in what ways have they been creative?
-
How public policy has assisted efforts
to develop creative entrepreneurship
|
16. |
Mr. Pham Gia Minh |
Vietnam |
Creative entrepreneurship in Vietnam:
Examples of innovative entrepreneurs
and serial entrepreneurs who followed
their initial successes with new and different
start-ups
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF ISSUES |
|
The participants devoted time in syndicate groups
to a discussion of what creative entrepreneurship
really means. They agreed that various definitions
existed but adopted Professor Tans proposed
definition of "any new business activity
involving creativity and innovation." The
definition is important as the type of enterprises
and mindsets that the countries, companies, and
individuals seek to establish are identified based
on the definition.
The participants were divided into three syndicate
groups to facilitate discussion and active learning
from the papers and site visits. The three syndicates
and the members are listed below.
Discussion syndicate groups |
Group 1 |
Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadpour Daryani (Iran) |
Mr. Myung Kwan Kim (ROK) |
Mr. Zainal Abidin bin
Othaman (Malaysia) |
Mr. Sukunta Lal Hirachan
(Nepal) |
Dr. Tay Ban Hock Aloysius
(Singapore) (leader) |
Group 2 |
Mr. Susanto Joseph (Indonesia) |
Mr. Dashdorj Banzragch
(Mongolia) |
Mr. Adrian Lim Meng Yan
(Singapore) |
Ms. Waleeporn Thanathikom
(Thailand) (leader) |
Mr. Pham Gia Minh (Vietnam) |
Mr. Kamal Dev (India) |
Group 3 |
Mr. Lee Yong Geun (ROK) |
Mr. Wiwat Chutiwanichayakul
(Thailand) |
Mr. Samantha Sathischandra
Wanniarachchi Kumarasinghe (Sri Lanka) (leader) |
Mr. Do Chi Thien (Vietnam) |
Dr. Justino Roces Arboleda
(Philippines) |
Through the discussions, the participants concluded
that to encourage creative entrepreneurship, policy
makers need to encourage the various stakeholders
in society to enhance the adoption of technology
and encourage innovation within enterprises. These
stakeholders include governments, trade associations,
and tertiary educational institutions.
The Role of Governments, Trade Associations,
and Other Stakeholders
It is important for governments, trade associations,
and other stakeholders to assist entrepreneurs
in sharpening their skills in management and leadership
qualities and to provide the necessary tools to
identify opportunities. They often provide the
external impetus and staff experience that lead
to productive changes in management processes
to facilitate the creation of new products and
services. Their suggested main roles are:
Government: foster the environment conducive
to creativity and the adoption of technology.
Trade/industrial bodies and societies: act as catalysts for business growth, facilitators
of governmental policies, and channels for businesses
information.
Institutions of higher learning: provide
specialists and researchers, platforms for technology
development, and tools for management and serve
as focal points for economic literacy.
They can provide platforms for entrepreneurs
to move forward in the right environment to create,
innovate, and adopt technologies to succeed or
to survive. There are six elements in successful
and positive environments for creative entrepreneurship:
market support, intelligence support, financial
support, legislative support, technology support,
and infrastructure support. These elements of
the environment should be freely accessible to
entrepreneurs. They should work hand-in-hand to
promote the efficiency and productivity of enterprises
leading to a synergistic outcome.
Pertinent to creative entrepreneurship is the
role of these stakeholders in the promotion of
innovation and technology adoption. The participants
recommended the following:
Networking
Networks should be encouraged as means for the
exchange of ideas. Alumni, trade, or industrial
bodies and societies, and informal business contacts
could provide a good platform for like-minded
and complementary businesspeople to interact,
exchange best practices, and possibly ignite technology
transfers among enterprises. Networks can facilitate
the rapid dissemination of knowledge and know-how.
In addition, trade or industrial bodies and societies
can be screening agents for good business matchmaking
opportunities for businesses, thus enhancing the
ability of businesses to collaborate.
Government Policies
Governments could assist in providing conducive
environments for the creation of innovation and
the adoption of technology. In many countries,
governments could provide technology upgrading
incentive schemes and financing schemes to ease
cash flows or increase capital for R&D activities
within enterprises. Governments may pass laws
or guidelines to protect SMEs from intellectual
property rights abuses. This will encourage small
businesses to innovate and reinvent.
The main objective of government policies on
these issues is a substantial net increase in
the level of high-quality R&D in enterprises
and to ensure an integrated and unified approach
to research-related activities. These should cover
industrial R&D, process development and innovation,
and technology acquisition.
Communication
Organizations should be encouraged to promote
open channels of communication among all levels
of management so that no ideas are brushed aside.
Stakeholders could play a significant role in
the provision of information and intelligence
to enterprises. For example, industrial associations
could provide regular updates on changes in government
policies and new incentive schemes to enterprises.
This would make it easier for enterprise decision
makers to utilize government incentive schemes.
Incubators and Mentors
Incubators run by universities and research groups
could assist businesses, especially SMEs, to grow
in a conducive environment. Researchers, specialists,
and consultants should be available to enterprises
being incubated. The credibility of the "host"
could lend weight to the tenants, thus attracting
better funding from the government or business
"angels." Access to R&D facilities
is the main advantage for promising SMEs to be
based in incubators. Mentors lend their experience
to the incubating enterprises and guide them through
potentially disruptive innovation.
Education
Educational institutions could provide the technical
know-how and innovation process management skills
to senior managers in corporations. Studies have
also shown that general education can enhance
innovation. The adoption of technologies is more
rapid in countries with higher literacy rates.
Thus education and academic institutions can play
a significant role in the adoption of technology
and innovation creation in an economy.
Business plan competitions, which incorporate
technology adoption and innovation, are a good
opportunity to start young would-be entrepreneurs
thinking about innovation at an early age.
APO Entrepreneur of the Year Award To encourage innovation and measure the success
of entrepreneurship, the participants suggested
the introduction of an APO Entrepreneur of the
Year Award (EYA). The award could provide a consistent
platform to measure successful entrepreneurship.
One main criterion for the APO EYA should be how
entrepreneurs encourage the use of technology
and the promotion of innovation in enterprises.
This may be the hallmark of a successful entrepreneur. |
|
CONCLUSION |
|
Overall, the study meeting met its intended objectives.
There was lively discussion of the issues faced
by member countries seeking to develop creative
entrepreneurship. The mix of policy makers, entrepreneurs,
and representatives from trade and professional
associations facilitated the discussions. The country
papers and case studies revealed the myriad forms
that creative entrepreneurship can take in an economy.
Positive feedback was obtained from the participants,
and some of the entrepreneurs found common interest
in business ventures and may pursue collaborative
alliances. |
|
|

|
Attachments: Annex
1 & 2 |
|